Opinion
February 8, 1999
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Orange County (Owen, J.).
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.
Contrary to the plaintiffs' contention, the jury verdict was based upon a fair interpretation of the evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence ( see, Nicastro v. Park, 113 A.D.2d 129). Moreover, at trial, the plaintiffs did not voice any objection or move for a mistrial with respect to certain remarks made by the defendant's counsel in summation. As a result, they failed to preserve for appellate review their challenge to these remarks ( see, Dunne v. Lemberg, 54 A.D.2d 955), which, in any event, does not require reversal.
Miller, J. P., Ritter, Goldstein and Luciano, JJ., concur.