From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Catto v. Schnepp

Supreme Court of New Jersey
Dec 18, 1972
297 A.2d 841 (N.J. 1972)

Opinion

Argued December 4, 1972 —

Decided December 18, 1972.

On appeal from Superior Court, Appellate Division.

Mr. James L. Cooper argued the cause for appellants Catto ( Messrs. Cooper, Greenberg, Katzman Todd, attorneys).

Mr. Gerald M. Eisenstat argued the cause for respondent Schnepp ( Messrs. Shapiro, Brotman, Eisenstat Capizola, attorneys).

Mr. Edward S. Miller argued the cause for respondent Township of Maurice River ( Messrs. Gant Miller, attorneys). Mr. Anthony D. Buonadonna argued the cause for respondent Cumberland County Board of Freeholders ( Messrs. Tuso and Gruccio, attorneys).


The judgment of the Appellate Division, 121 N.J. Super. 506, is affirmed substantially for the reasons expressed in its opinion.

For affirmance — Chief Justice WEINTRAUB, Justices JACOBS, HALL and MOUNTAIN, and Judges CONFORD and LEWIS — 6.

For reversal — None.


Summaries of

Catto v. Schnepp

Supreme Court of New Jersey
Dec 18, 1972
297 A.2d 841 (N.J. 1972)
Case details for

Catto v. Schnepp

Case Details

Full title:ROBERT F. CATTO, AN INFANT BY HIS GUARDIAN AD LITEM, GREGG CATTO, AND…

Court:Supreme Court of New Jersey

Date published: Dec 18, 1972

Citations

297 A.2d 841 (N.J. 1972)
297 A.2d 841

Citing Cases

Scafidi v. Seiler

A plaintiff seeking to recover for another's negligence must prove that the negligence was a proximate cause…

Roberts v. Biancamano

5. To recover in a negligence action in New Jersey, a plaintiff must establish: 1) that the defendant owed…