From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cater v. Lantern Group

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 23, 2010
71 A.D.3d 555 (N.Y. App. Div. 2010)

Opinion

No. 2398.

March 23, 2010.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Debra A. James, J.), entered June 24, 2009, which granted defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Vernon Ginsburg, LLP, New York (Mel B. Ginsburg of counsel), for appellant.

Sperber Denenberg Kahan, PC, New York (Eric H. Kahan of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Mazzarelli, J.P., Saxe, Nardelli, Abdus-Salaam and Román, JJ.


The e-mails between the parties conclusively negate plaintiffs claim that the parties entered into a contract ( see hanger v Dadabhoy, 44 AD3d 425, lv denied 10 NY3d 712; Aksman v Xiongwei Ju, 21 AD3d 260, lv denied 5 NY3d 715). Here, the e-mails expressed the parties' intention to enter into a contract at a later date. The e-mails referred to "Notes for Agreement" and a "draft contract" and repeatedly referred to the formal contract signing, reflecting the parties' intent not to be bound until a formal agreement was signed ( Aksman, 21 AD3d at 261-262).


Summaries of

Cater v. Lantern Group

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 23, 2010
71 A.D.3d 555 (N.Y. App. Div. 2010)
Case details for

Cater v. Lantern Group

Case Details

Full title:OUI CATER, INC., Appellant, v. THE LANTERN GROUP, INC., Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Mar 23, 2010

Citations

71 A.D.3d 555 (N.Y. App. Div. 2010)
2010 N.Y. Slip Op. 2418
896 N.Y.S.2d 678

Citing Cases

RNK Cap. v. Nat-Source

Before: Saxe, J.P., Friedman, Nardelli, Moskowitz and Richter, JJ. As the motion court ultimately recognized…

JTS Trading Ltd. v. Trinity White City Ventures Ltd.

" Aksman v. Xiongweii Ju, 21 A.D.3d 260, 261-262 (1st. Dept. 2005) (finding that a letter of intent was not a…