From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cate v. Pirtle

U.S.
Jun 13, 2011
564 U.S. 1001 (2011)

Opinion

No. 10–868.

06-13-2011

Matthew CATE, Secretary, California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, et al., petitioners, v. John H. PIRTLE. Matthew Cate, Secretary, California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, et al., petitioners, v. Robert Everett Johnson; James Hartley, Warden, petitioner, v. Anthony Sneed; Matthew Cate, Secretary, California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, petitioner, v. Ron Mosley; and Matthew Cate, Secretary, California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, petitioner, v. Michael Craig Slater.


On petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. Motions of respondents John H. Pirtle, Robert Everett Johnson, Anthony Sneed, and Michael Craig Slater for leave to proceed in forma pauperis granted. Petition for writ of certiorari as to John H. Pirtle, Robert Everett Johnson, Anthony Sneed, and Michael Craig Slater granted. Judgments vacated, and cases remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit for further consideration in light of Swarthout v. Cooke, 562 U.S. ––––, 131 S.Ct. 859, 178 L.Ed.2d 732 (2011) (per curiam ). Petition for writ of certiorari as to Ron Mosley denied.


Summaries of

Cate v. Pirtle

U.S.
Jun 13, 2011
564 U.S. 1001 (2011)
Case details for

Cate v. Pirtle

Case Details

Full title:CATE, SEC, CA DOC, ET AL. v. JOHN H. PIRTLE

Court:U.S.

Date published: Jun 13, 2011

Citations

564 U.S. 1001 (2011)
131 S. Ct. 2988
180 L. Ed. 2d 818

Citing Cases

Johnson v. Finn

The Supreme Court granted certiorari, vacated, and remanded for reconsideration in light of Swarthout v.…

In re Bettencourt

On August 20, 2010, Bettencourt filed a motion for reconsideration of the superior court's August 11, 2010…