From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cassirer v. Kingdom of Spain

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Dec 30, 2009
590 F.3d 981 (9th Cir. 2009)

Opinion

Nos. 06-56325, 06-56406.

December 30, 2009.

Stuart Russell Dunwoody, I, Esquire, Davis Wright Tremaine, LLP, Seattle, WA, Andrew R. Hall, Esquire, Davis Wright Tremaine, LLP, Los Angeles, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

William M. Barron, Esquire, Smith, Gambrell Russell, LLP, New York, NY, Elizabeth A. Fierman, Esquire, Alston Bird, LLP, Los Angeles, CA, for Defendant.

Walter T. Johnson, Nixon Peabody, LLP, San Francisco, CA, Thaddeus J. Stauber, Nixon Peabody, LLP, Los Angeles, CA, for Defendant-Appellant.

D.C. No. CV-05-03459-GAF.


ORDER


Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit.


Summaries of

Cassirer v. Kingdom of Spain

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Dec 30, 2009
590 F.3d 981 (9th Cir. 2009)
Case details for

Cassirer v. Kingdom of Spain

Case Details

Full title:Claude CASSIRER, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. KINGDOM OF SPAIN, a foreign state…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Dec 30, 2009

Citations

590 F.3d 981 (9th Cir. 2009)

Citing Cases

Cassirer v. Kingdom of Spain

The panel held that § 1605(a)(3) does not require Spain to be the entity that expropriated the painting in…