From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cassinelli v. Cassinelli

Supreme Court of the United States
Oct 2, 2017
138 S. Ct. 69 (2017)

Summary

vacating and remanding a judgment "in light of [Howell ]," which found that a military spouse was required to reimburse a civilian spouse for electing to waive retirement pay and receive disability benefits, though reimbursement need not be directly from the disability benefits

Summary of this case from Yourko v. Yourko

Opinion

No. 16–8811.

10-02-2017

Robert J. CASSINELLI, petitioner, v. Janice R. CASSINELLI.


On petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeal of California, Fourth Appellate District, Division Two. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and petition for writ of certiorari granted. Judgment vacated, and case remanded to the Court of Appeal of California, Fourth Appellate District, Division Two for further consideration in light of Howell v. Howell, 581 U.S. ––––, 137 S.Ct. 1400, 197 L.Ed.2d 781 (2017).


Summaries of

Cassinelli v. Cassinelli

Supreme Court of the United States
Oct 2, 2017
138 S. Ct. 69 (2017)

vacating and remanding a judgment "in light of [Howell ]," which found that a military spouse was required to reimburse a civilian spouse for electing to waive retirement pay and receive disability benefits, though reimbursement need not be directly from the disability benefits

Summary of this case from Yourko v. Yourko
Case details for

Cassinelli v. Cassinelli

Case Details

Full title:Robert J. CASSINELLI, petitioner, v. Janice R. CASSINELLI.

Court:Supreme Court of the United States

Date published: Oct 2, 2017

Citations

138 S. Ct. 69 (2017)
199 L. Ed. 2d 2

Citing Cases

Foster v. Foster

Merrill , 238 Ariz. at 470, 362 P.3d 1034.In re Marriage of Cassinelli , 4 Cal. App. 5th 1285, 1291, 1297,…

Yourko v. Yourko

See also Foster v. Foster, 505 Mich. 151, 949 N.W.2d 102 (2020) (relying on Howell in concluding the trial…