From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cashman v. Cashman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Oct 2, 1962
17 A.D.2d 770 (N.Y. App. Div. 1962)

Opinion

October 2, 1962


Order, entered on June 12, 1962, unanimously reversed on the law and on the facts, with $20 costs and disbursements to the appellant, and the motion for the allowance of counsel fees to plaintiff denied in all respects, with $10 costs. There is no authority for the allowance of counsel fees to the plaintiff wife in this action which is brought to declare the invalidity of a foreign divorce procured by her as plaintiff and to declare the invalidity of a subsequent marriage of defendant to a third person. Section 1140-a of the Civil Practice Act, cited by Special Term, is not applicable under the circumstances here. Nor is the allowance supported by the provisions of section 1169 or 1169-a thereof pursuant to which the motion was purportedly made.

Concur — Breitel, J.P., Rabin, Valente, Eager and Steuer, JJ.


Summaries of

Cashman v. Cashman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Oct 2, 1962
17 A.D.2d 770 (N.Y. App. Div. 1962)
Case details for

Cashman v. Cashman

Case Details

Full title:JILL CASHMAN, Respondent, v. IRWIN CASHMAN, Appellant, et al., Defendant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Oct 2, 1962

Citations

17 A.D.2d 770 (N.Y. App. Div. 1962)

Citing Cases

Wood v. Wood

Moreover, the power of a court upon a motion in a matrimonial action, to fix and direct payment of counsel…

Di Russo v. Di Russo

The grant or refusal of temporary alimony does not constitute the law of the case any more than does the…