From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Casey v. Shane

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jul 19, 1928
162 N.E. 551 (N.Y. 1928)

Summary

In Casey v. Shane (248 N.Y. 625), an order of the Special Term granting plaintiff's motion to strike out the same defense in an action of this kind was affirmed on the authority of the Clark case, since it was shown that the subcontractor had secured compensation.

Summary of this case from Sweezey v. Arc Electrical Construction Co.

Opinion

Submitted June 21, 1928

Decided July 19, 1928

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department.

F. Ferris Hewitt for appellant.

Harry E. Wareham for respondents.


Judgment of Appellate Division reversed and order of Special Term affirmed, with costs in the Appellate Division and in this court on the authority of Clark v. Monarch Engineering Co. ( 248 N.Y. 107).

Concur: CARDOZO, Ch. J., POUND, ANDREWS, LEHMAN, KELLOGG and O'BRIEN, JJ. Not sitting: CRANE, J.


Summaries of

Casey v. Shane

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jul 19, 1928
162 N.E. 551 (N.Y. 1928)

In Casey v. Shane (248 N.Y. 625), an order of the Special Term granting plaintiff's motion to strike out the same defense in an action of this kind was affirmed on the authority of the Clark case, since it was shown that the subcontractor had secured compensation.

Summary of this case from Sweezey v. Arc Electrical Construction Co.
Case details for

Casey v. Shane

Case Details

Full title:PATRICK W. CASEY, Appellant, v. FRANK A. SHANE et al., Individually and as…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Jul 19, 1928

Citations

162 N.E. 551 (N.Y. 1928)
162 N.E. 551

Citing Cases

Sweezey v. Arc Electrical Construction Co.

" It was held that in the absence of such showing, at least, the common-law liability of a general contractor…

Sweezey v. Arc Electrical Construction Co.

The general contractor's liability as a negligent third party, therefore, was held to remain. In Casey v.…