From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Casey v. Olson

United States District Court, S.D. California
Aug 6, 2010
CASE NO. 09-cv-1111-JAH (POR) (S.D. Cal. Aug. 6, 2010)

Opinion

CASE NO. 09-cv-1111-JAH (POR).

August 6, 2010


ORDER GRANTING JOINT MOTION TO DISMISS ACTION AS TO DEFENDANT ST. STEPHEN STATE BANK WITH PREJUDICE PURSUANT TO F.R.C.P. § 41


Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(ii), and based on the stipulated Joint Motion for Dismissal filed by Plaintiff THOMAS F. CASEY and defendant ST. STEPHEN STATE BANK, a Minnesota corporation:

The Court hereby GRANTS the parties' Joint Motion for Dismissal and DISMISSES WITH PREJUDICE the present action as to defendant ST. STEPHEN BANK, a Minnesota corporation, its successors and assigns only.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Casey v. Olson

United States District Court, S.D. California
Aug 6, 2010
CASE NO. 09-cv-1111-JAH (POR) (S.D. Cal. Aug. 6, 2010)
Case details for

Casey v. Olson

Case Details

Full title:THOMAS F. CASEY Plaintiff, v. ROBERT OLSON, LANCE MORQUE, GARY HAWLEY, AND…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. California

Date published: Aug 6, 2010

Citations

CASE NO. 09-cv-1111-JAH (POR) (S.D. Cal. Aug. 6, 2010)

Citing Cases

Solarcity Corp. v. Doria

See Cal. Civ. Code § 1646.5. When a contract fails to specify the applicable law, California law is presumed…