From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Carwile v. Carwile

Court of Appeals of Virginia. Richmond
Jul 30, 2002
Record No. 3107-01-2 (Va. Ct. App. Jul. 30, 2002)

Opinion

Record No. 3107-01-2.

July 30, 2002.

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Henrico County, Catherine C. Hammond, Judge.

Patrick R. Bynum, Jr., for appellant.

Carol Dois Woodward for appellee.

Present: Judges Elder, Bumgardner and Clements.


MEMORANDUM OPINION

Pursuant to Code § 17.1-413, this opinion is not designated for publication.


Leslie Parker Carwile and Sandra M. Carwile were divorced by decree dated June 25, 2001. The husband contends the trial court erred in calculating spousal support and in classifying the marital residence and a mutual fund. Because the record is not sufficient to determine the issues raised, we dismiss.

The evidence consisted of depositions and testimony heard ore tenus on May 7, 2001. At that hearing, all issues were considered. Witnesses, who had earlier given evidence by deposition, testified further and the husband's father, for whom no deposition appears in the record, also testified. In its letter opinion, the trial court refers to the evidence presented May 7, 2001, and the opinion clearly relies on it in making its factual findings on each of the issues raised by the husband in this appeal.

"An appellate court must dispose of the case upon the record and cannot base its decision upon appellant's petition or brief, or statements of counsel in open court. We may act only upon facts contained in the record." Smith v. Commonwealth, 16 Va. App. 630, 635, 432 S.E.2d 2, 6 (1993) (citation omitted). "[O]n appeal the judgment of the lower court is presumed to be correct and the burden is on the appellant to present to us a sufficient record from which we can determine whether the lower court has erred in the respect complained of." Justis v. Young, 202 Va. 631, 632, 119 S.E.2d 255, 256-57 (1961).

"The burden is upon the appellant to provide us with a record which substantiates the claim of error. In the absence thereof, we will not consider the point." Jenkins v. Winchester Dep't of Soc. Servs., 12 Va. App. 1178, 1185, 409 S.E.2d 16, 20 (1991) (citation omitted). Because the trial court's decision rested on evidence presented at theore tenus hearing, a transcript is "indispensable to the determination of the case." Turner v. Commonwealth, 2 Va. App. 96, 99, 341 S.E.2d 400, 402 (1986). Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal.

Dismissed.


Summaries of

Carwile v. Carwile

Court of Appeals of Virginia. Richmond
Jul 30, 2002
Record No. 3107-01-2 (Va. Ct. App. Jul. 30, 2002)
Case details for

Carwile v. Carwile

Case Details

Full title:LESLIE PARKER CARWILE v. SANDRA M. CARWILE

Court:Court of Appeals of Virginia. Richmond

Date published: Jul 30, 2002

Citations

Record No. 3107-01-2 (Va. Ct. App. Jul. 30, 2002)

Citing Cases

Scott v. Southern Coach and Body Co.

The letter may have been irrelevant and immaterial, and, in order to put the court in error, the record…

Brown v. Kevorkian

Rhodes Son v. Charleston, 41 So. 746, 148 Ala. 671; W. of A. v. Russell, 39 So. 311, 144 Ala. 142, 113 Am.…