holding that the Taxing Units were not entitled to post-petition penalties, fees or costs as part of their secured claim for unpaid taxes because such charges were not pursuant to an agreement
Summary of this case from In re NunezNo. 91-1905.
June 29, 1992, October TERM, 1991.
C.A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 951 F. 2d 1083.
holding that the Taxing Units were not entitled to post-petition penalties, fees or costs as part of their secured claim for unpaid taxes because such charges were not pursuant to an agreement
Summary of this case from In re Nunezrecognizing that Pennsylvania follows the "classic" M'Naghten test for insanity
Summary of this case from Com. v. Dupontrelying on the "plain language of the Code," the court denied standing to a Chapter 11 creditor seeking to invoke avoidance powers under section 549 of the Bankruptcy Code
Summary of this case from Matter of HamiltonFull title:CARVER ET AL. v. WESTINGHOUSE HANFORD CO. ET AL
Court:U.S.
Date published: Jun 29, 1992
While we agree with plaintiff that such acts could provide the foundation for an action under Judiciary Law §…
U.S. v. TittjungId. at 257. This Court affirmed the district court's order in an opinion dated November 14, 1991, 948 F.2d…