From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Carter v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Feb 10, 1976
225 S.E.2d 64 (Ga. Ct. App. 1976)

Opinion

51653.

ARGUED JANUARY 6, 1976.

DECIDED FEBRUARY 10, 1976. REHEARING DENIED MARCH 2, 1976.

Drug violation. Fulton Superior Court. Before Judge Williams.

Murray M. Silver, John Milton Turner, II, for appellant.

Lewis R. Slaton, District Attorney, Joseph J. Drolet, H. Allen Moye, Assistant District Attorneys, for appellee.


Appellant was convicted of three violations of the Georgia Controlled Substances Act. He appeals the judgment of conviction.

Appellant enumerates error on the court's denial of his motion to suppress. During the trial of the case, the state introduced into evidence the drugs which were the subject of appellant's motion to suppress. Defense counsel stated that he had no objection to the introduction of this evidence. (T-72). By this action, defense counsel waived any objection which might have been urged including those contained in the motion to suppress. "It is a well settled rule in this state that it is too late to urge objections to the admission of evidence after it has been admitted without objection [Cits.]" Childers v. State, 130 Ga. App. 555, 556 ( 203 S.E.2d 874).

Judgment affirmed. Evans and Marshall, JJ., concur.

ARGUED JANUARY 6, 1976 — DECIDED FEBRUARY 10, 1976 — REHEARING DENIED MARCH 2, 1976.


Summaries of

Carter v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Feb 10, 1976
225 S.E.2d 64 (Ga. Ct. App. 1976)
Case details for

Carter v. State

Case Details

Full title:CARTER v. THE STATE

Court:Court of Appeals of Georgia

Date published: Feb 10, 1976

Citations

225 S.E.2d 64 (Ga. Ct. App. 1976)
225 S.E.2d 64

Citing Cases

Yarbrough v. State

It is well settled in this state that it is too late to urge objections to the admission of evidence after it…

Sisson v. State

It is a well settled rule in this state that it is too late to urge objections to the admission of evidence…