Summary
In Castillo v. State, 466 So.2d 7 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985) the court reversed a conviction and remanded the case for a new trial on the authority of Neil, noting that the question of whether a defendant may protest that an identifiable group other than his own has been systematicaly excluded from the petit jury had been answered in the affirmative in Peters v. Kiff, 407 U.S. 493, 92 S.Ct. 2163, 33 L.Ed.2d 83 (1972).
Summary of this case from Kibler v. StateOpinion
No. 84-580.
March 12, 1985. Rehearing Denied April 17, 1985.
An appeal from Circuit Court, Dade County; Murray Goldman, Judge.
Anthony J. Scremin and Greg C. McGibney, Miami, for appellant.
Joel H. Brown and Robert Corirossi, Miami, for appellees.
Before HENDRY, NESBITT and FERGUSON, JJ.
Affirmed. Kuba v. Leb, 464 So.2d 601 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985) and cases cited. Hendricks v. Dailey, 208 So.2d 101 (Fla. 1968).