From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Carter v. Astrue

United States District Court, M.D. Georgia, Valdosta Division
Sep 30, 2008
7:07-CV-148 (WLS) (M.D. Ga. Sep. 30, 2008)

Opinion

7:07-CV-148 (WLS).

September 30, 2008


ORDER


Before the Court is a Recommendation from United States Magistrate Judge G. Mallon Faircloth (Doc. 11), filed August 7, 2008. It is recommended that the Commissioner's decision to adopt the ALJ's decision be adopted pursuant to Sentence Four of § 405(g). Claimant filed an objection on August 29, 2008, outside the time specified by the rules. Claimant is represented by counsel and provided no explanation for her late filing, and did not request additional time to file her objections. Therefore, Claimant's untimely objections were not considered by the Court.

Upon full consideration of the record, the Court finds that said Recommendation (Doc. 11) should be, and hereby is, ACCEPTED, ADOPTED and made the order of this Court for reason of the findings and reasons set out therein together with the reasons stated and conclusions reached herein. The Commissioner's decision is AFFIRMED pursuant to Sentence Four of § 405(g).

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Carter v. Astrue

United States District Court, M.D. Georgia, Valdosta Division
Sep 30, 2008
7:07-CV-148 (WLS) (M.D. Ga. Sep. 30, 2008)
Case details for

Carter v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:DEBORAH J. CARTER, Claimant, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social…

Court:United States District Court, M.D. Georgia, Valdosta Division

Date published: Sep 30, 2008

Citations

7:07-CV-148 (WLS) (M.D. Ga. Sep. 30, 2008)

Citing Cases

Russell v. Astrue

See Robinson v. Astrue, No. 09-12472, 2010 WL 582617, *2 (11th Cir. Feb. 19, 2010) (holding that the ALJ had…

Blair v. Astrue

Courts have held that such frequent absences likely would preclude substantial gainful employment. See White…