From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Carroll v. Warden

Court of Appeals of Maryland
Nov 11, 1952
92 A.2d 449 (Md. 1952)

Opinion

[H.C. No. 14, October Term, 1953.]

Decided November 11, 1952.

HABEAS CORPUS — 3rd Application On Same Grounds. A third application for leave to appeal from a refusal of the writ of habeas corpus on the same grounds as the first and second ones will be denied. pp. 647-648

Decided November 11, 1952.

Habeas corpus proceeding by Leroy Carroll against Warden of Maryland Penitentiary. From a refusal of the writ, petitioner applied for leave to appeal.

Application denied.

Before MARKELL, C.J., and DELAPLAINE, COLLINS and HENDERSON, JJ.


This is an application for leave to appeal from denial of a writ of habeas corpus. Petitioner is imprisoned under sentence for 20 years on conviction of assault with intent to rape. The alleged offense was committed at or near a prison camp near Elkton of which petitioner was a member. At the time he was under a sentence of 4 years which has since expired. He alleges that he was not guilty and (with great detail) that the evidence so indicates. He alleges that he was "denied" "taking the stand" by his court-appointed counsel, but not that he made any complaint to the court concerning this advice or "denial". It appears that he has made repeated applications for habeas corpus on the same grounds, all of which applications have been denied. Habeas corpus cannot be made to serve the purpose of an appeal or a new trial of the question of guilt or innocence.

Application denied, with costs.


Summaries of

Carroll v. Warden

Court of Appeals of Maryland
Nov 11, 1952
92 A.2d 449 (Md. 1952)
Case details for

Carroll v. Warden

Case Details

Full title:CARROLL v . WARDEN OF MARYLAND PENITENTIARY

Court:Court of Appeals of Maryland

Date published: Nov 11, 1952

Citations

92 A.2d 449 (Md. 1952)
92 A.2d 449

Citing Cases

Roberts v. Warden

There can be no possible doubt, we think, that the pleas were entered in his presence with his full knowledge…

Hall v. Warden

Even on direct appeal the trial tactics of counsel are not ordinarily reviewable by this Court. Hardesty v.…