From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Carroll v. Mission Insurance Company

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Sep 21, 1978
147 Ga. App. 262 (Ga. Ct. App. 1978)

Opinion

56399.

ARGUED SEPTEMBER 6, 1978.

DECIDED SEPTEMBER 21, 1978.

Workers' compensation. Fulton Superior Court. Before Judge Shaw.

George George, Lavinia B. George, for appellant.

Savell, Williams, Cox Angel, Lawson A. Cox, II, John C. Parker, for appellees.


The administrative law judge in this workman's compensation case, after an all issues hearing, held that the claimant had not carried his burden of proving that his disability had been proximately caused by the March 23 and October 5, 1976 injuries at Southern Foundry Supply. The full board on appeal affirmed, and adopted the ALJ's findings and conclusions. The superior court affirmed the board's conclusions, finding there was ample evidence in the record to support the award. We affirm.

The board having made a factual finding that the claimant had not carried his burden of proving that his disability was proximately caused by the March and October, 1976 injuries, the issue before us is simply whether there is any evidence in the record to support the board's findings and award. We conclude that there was. Lockhart v. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co., 141 Ga. App. 476, 478 (1) ( 233 S.E.2d 810) (1977). The board is the fact finder, and its findings here must be affirmed under the "any evidence" rule. Utica Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 142 Ga. App. 548 ( 236 S.E.2d 531) (1977).

Judgment affirmed. Quillian, P. J., and McMurray, J., concur.

ARGUED SEPTEMBER 6, 1978 — DECIDED SEPTEMBER 21, 1978.


Summaries of

Carroll v. Mission Insurance Company

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Sep 21, 1978
147 Ga. App. 262 (Ga. Ct. App. 1978)
Case details for

Carroll v. Mission Insurance Company

Case Details

Full title:CARROLL v. MISSION INSURANCE COMPANY et al

Court:Court of Appeals of Georgia

Date published: Sep 21, 1978

Citations

147 Ga. App. 262 (Ga. Ct. App. 1978)
248 S.E.2d 542

Citing Cases

Seckinger Co. v. Foreman

Thus the evidence authorized the finding against Seckinger that it was a joint venturer. Carroll v. Mission…

Hartford Insurance Group v. Voyles

Any doubt on this question must be resolved in favor of claimant's status as an employee rather than an…