From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Carroll v. Camden

Supreme Court of New Jersey
Jun 6, 1966
220 A.2d 111 (N.J. 1966)

Opinion

Argued May 23, 1966 —

Decided June 6, 1966.

On appeal from Superior Court, Appellate Division.

Mr. Carlton W. Rowand argued the cause for appellant.

Mr. Joseph M. Nardi, Jr. argued the cause for respondent City of Camden.

Mr. Mark H. Watson argued the cause for respondent The Delaware River Port Authority of Pennsylvania and New Jersey ( Mr. Thomas F. Connery, Jr., attorney).

Mr. Martin F. McKernan filed a statement on behalf of respondent The Housing Authority of the City of Camden.


The appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial constitutional question.

For dismissal — Chief Justice WEINTRAUB and Justices JACOBS, FRANCIS, PROCTOR, HALL and SCHETTINO — 6.

Opposed — None.


Summaries of

Carroll v. Camden

Supreme Court of New Jersey
Jun 6, 1966
220 A.2d 111 (N.J. 1966)
Case details for

Carroll v. Camden

Case Details

Full title:JOHN J. CARROLL, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. CITY OF CAMDEN, A MUNICIPAL…

Court:Supreme Court of New Jersey

Date published: Jun 6, 1966

Citations

220 A.2d 111 (N.J. 1966)
220 A.2d 111

Citing Cases

Lyons v. Camden

The issue was disposed of in Wilson v. City of Long Branch, supra, and there is no need to review the matter…

Henry v. New Jersey Department of Human Services

State v. Washington, 47 N.J. 244, 220 A.2d 185 (1966). Carroll v. Camden, 47 N.J. 238, 220 A.2d 111 (1966).…