From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Carpenter v. D'Agostino Supermarkets, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 9, 2000
270 A.D.2d 51 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)

Opinion

March 9, 2000

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Louise Gruner Gans, J.), entered on or about September 24, 1999, which, in an action for personal injuries sustained in a trip and fall on defendant supermarket's premises, denied defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Edward J. Martz for plaintiffs-respondents.

Christine M. Capitolo for defendant-appellant.

Sullivan, P.J., Ellerin, Lerner, Buckley, JJ.


In opposition to the motion, plaintiff adduced evidence that shortly after she fell she spoke to defendant's store manager, who interviewed her, helped her fill out the Store Incident Report contained in the record that he signed as "Store Manager", acknowledged an awareness of the allegedly hazardous spill where she had fallen and stated that it was supposed to have been cleaned up. The statements by the former store manager, who had general supervision over the operation of the store, would be admissible on the issue of whether defendant had actual notice of the allegedly hazardous condition.

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.


Summaries of

Carpenter v. D'Agostino Supermarkets, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 9, 2000
270 A.D.2d 51 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
Case details for

Carpenter v. D'Agostino Supermarkets, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:JEANETTE CARPENTER, et al., Plaintiffs-Respondents, v. D'AGOSTINO…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Mar 9, 2000

Citations

270 A.D.2d 51 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
704 N.Y.S.2d 57

Citing Cases

Navedo v. 250 Willis Ave. S

The IAS court granted defendant's motion to dismiss on the ground that there was no admissible evidence that…

Elhorin v. W. Beef, Inc.

Hearsay evidence may be sufficient to demonstrate the existence of a triable fact where it is not the only…