From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Caro v. Frasca

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 25, 1993
197 A.D.2d 657 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)

Opinion

October 25, 1993

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Queens County (Smith, J.).


Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

Absent "cogent reasons" to direct otherwise, the venue of a transitory action should be the county where the cause of action arose (see, German v. Swendsen, 112 A.D.2d 139, 140). No such cogent reasons are presented in the record before us. Bracken, J.P., Balletta, Eiber, O'Brien and Santucci, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Caro v. Frasca

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 25, 1993
197 A.D.2d 657 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)
Case details for

Caro v. Frasca

Case Details

Full title:SALVATOR CARO et al., Respondents, v. GEORGE FRASCA, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Oct 25, 1993

Citations

197 A.D.2d 657 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)
603 N.Y.S.2d 16

Citing Cases

O'Brien v. Vassar Bros. Hosp

We disagree. There is, we acknowledge, a line of cases in which there appear statements to the effect that…