In Carlson, the court classified the plaintiffs as executives because they held positions of senior analyst, chief operating officer, portfolio manager and managing principal and they possessed some kind of supervisory authority.
Summary of this case from Rich v. Jpmorgan Chase Co.January 27, 2006.
Employment Relationships — Wages — Incentive Compensation.
In Carlson, the court classified the plaintiffs as executives because they held positions of senior analyst, chief operating officer, portfolio manager and managing principal and they possessed some kind of supervisory authority.
Summary of this case from Rich v. Jpmorgan Chase Co.Full title:CARLSON v. KATONAH CAPITAL, L.L.C
Court:Supreme Court of the State of New York. NEW YORK COUNTY
Date published: Jan 27, 2006
Section 2(b)(ii) of the employment contract specifically lists factors TLM may use in determining plaintiffs…
Rich v. Jpmorgan Chase Co.These decisions "ha[ve] made clear that executives do not qualify as employees for the purposes of asserting…