From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Carlin v. Goldman Industries, Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Jul 6, 1977
347 So. 2d 827 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1977)

Opinion

No. 76-1100.

July 6, 1977.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Dade County, Harold R. Vann, J.

Schwartz, Klein Steinhardt and Norman S. Klein, North Miami Beach, for appellants.

Weinstein Bavly and Arthur J. Morburger, Miami, Jones Morcroft and Richard S. Zaifert, Fort Lauderdale, for appellees.

Before BARKDULL, HAVERFIELD and NATHAN, JJ.


Sadie Carlin and Louis Carlin (her husband), plaintiffs in the trial court, appeal from an adverse summary final judgment in a negligence action.

Sadie Carlin slipped and fell while dancing at the social hall of the Sky Lake Condominium. Thereafter, Sadie and her husband filed suit, seeking damages for injury to Sadie's hip. Named as defendants were Jerome Weinstein [who allegedly negligently and carelessly applied wax to the dance floor] and his insurer, Allstate Insurance Company; also the building's management, Goldman Industries, Inc., and Skylake Garden Recreation, Inc., and its insurer, Allstate Insurance Company. The trial court granted the defendants' motions for summary judgment, apparently because of admissions in plaintiff-Sadie Carlin's deposition disclosing assumption of the risk. This appeal ensued. We reverse.

In this State, an injured party may have a cause of action for a fall on a dance floor. Durden v. Dranetz, 99 So.2d 716 (Fla. 3rd D.C.A. 1958). The Supreme Court of Florida has now determined that assumption of the risk is no longer available as a complete defense. See: Blackburn v. Dorta, 348 So.2d 287 (Fla. 3rd D.C.A. 1977), opinion filed May 5, 1977.

It is noted that this cited opinion was not available to the trial judge at the time he rendered the summary final judgment in this action.

Therefore, the summary final judgment be and the same is hereby reversed, and the cause is returned to the trial court for further proceedings.

Reversed and remanded, with directions.


Summaries of

Carlin v. Goldman Industries, Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Jul 6, 1977
347 So. 2d 827 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1977)
Case details for

Carlin v. Goldman Industries, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:SADIE CARLIN AND LOUIS CARLIN, HER HUSBAND, APPELLANTS, v. GOLDMAN…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Jul 6, 1977

Citations

347 So. 2d 827 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1977)

Citing Cases

Rutecki v. Sorkin

Accordingly, the summary judgment is reversed and the cause remanded to the trial court for further…