From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Carino v. Pilon

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jul 7, 1988
142 A.D.2d 996 (N.Y. App. Div. 1988)

Opinion

July 7, 1988

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Oneida County, O'Donnell, J.

Present — Denman, J.P., Boomer, Pine, Lawton and Davis, JJ.


Judgment unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: We affirm for the reasons set forth in the memorandum at Special Term (O'Donnell, J.). We add only that a CPLR article 78 proceeding is not the proper proceeding in which to challenge the constitutionality of a zoning ordinance (Matter of Overhill Bldg. Co. v. Delany, 28 N.Y.2d 449, 458).


Summaries of

Carino v. Pilon

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jul 7, 1988
142 A.D.2d 996 (N.Y. App. Div. 1988)
Case details for

Carino v. Pilon

Case Details

Full title:JOSEPH A. CARINO, Appellant, v. EARL PILON, as Chairman of the Zoning…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Jul 7, 1988

Citations

142 A.D.2d 996 (N.Y. App. Div. 1988)

Citing Cases

Town of Deerfield, N.Y. v. F.C.C

Carino appealed unsuccessfully. The Appellate Division affirmed the denial of Carino's petition substantially…

Jensen v. Village of Old Westbury

The merit of the constitutional claim is not in issue on this appeal. The denial or dismissal of the variance…