From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Card Technology Corporation v. Datacard Corporation

United States District Court, D. Minnesota
Feb 21, 2007
Civil No. 05-2546 (MJD/SRN) (D. Minn. Feb. 21, 2007)

Summary

staying only the patent counterclaims and allowing counterclaim brought under supplemental jurisdiction to proceed

Summary of this case from Segin Sys., Inc. v. Stewart Title Guar. Co.

Opinion

Civil No. 05-2546 (MJD/SRN).

February 21, 2007


ORDER


The above-entitled matter comes before the Court upon the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Susan Richard Nelson dated February 2, 2007. No objections have been filed to that Report and Recommendation in the time period permitted.

Based on the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, and all of the files, records and proceedings herein,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Plaintiff's motion to stay certain of Defendant's counterclaims pending the PTO's reexamination proceedings (Doc. No. 80) is GRANTED IN PART (to the extent that it seeks to stay the Patent Counterclaims (Counts I II) and DENIED IN PART (to the extent that it seeks to stay the Nigerian Counterclaim (Count V).


Summaries of

Card Technology Corporation v. Datacard Corporation

United States District Court, D. Minnesota
Feb 21, 2007
Civil No. 05-2546 (MJD/SRN) (D. Minn. Feb. 21, 2007)

staying only the patent counterclaims and allowing counterclaim brought under supplemental jurisdiction to proceed

Summary of this case from Segin Sys., Inc. v. Stewart Title Guar. Co.

noting distinctions between patent claim and counterclaim for tortious interference with prospective business advantage

Summary of this case from Gryphon Networks Corp.. v. Contact Ctr. Compliance Corp..
Case details for

Card Technology Corporation v. Datacard Corporation

Case Details

Full title:Card Technology Corporation, Plaintiff, v. DataCard Corporation…

Court:United States District Court, D. Minnesota

Date published: Feb 21, 2007

Citations

Civil No. 05-2546 (MJD/SRN) (D. Minn. Feb. 21, 2007)

Citing Cases

Segin Sys., Inc. v. Stewart Title Guar. Co.

In light of the precedent Plaintiffs cite and other precedent of which the Court is aware, the Court finds…

Gryphon Networks Corp.. v. Contact Ctr. Compliance Corp..

Moreover, the scope and subject of the patent claim is distinct from and does not entirely overlap the scope…