Opinion
April 25, 1994
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Queens County (Rutledge, J.).
Ordered that the order is modified, on the law, by deleting the provision thereof imposing sanctions and counsel fees; as so modified, the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements, and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Queens County, for a hearing in accordance herewith.
The court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in compelling the appellants to comply with all outstanding discovery (see, Kaplan v Herbstein, 175 A.D.2d 200).
In imposing sanctions and counsel fees against the appellants' counsel, the court failed to set forth in a written decision the offending conduct, why the court found the conduct frivolous, and why the amount awarded was appropriate. In addition, we question whether the appellants were afforded an appropriate opportunity to be heard (see, 22 NYCRR 130-1.2; Flaherty v Stavropoulos, 199 A.D.2d 301). However, based upon our review of the record, we conclude that there was a sufficient basis for the court to impose sanctions and counsel fees based upon counsel's conduct and therefore, the matter is remitted for a hearing on the issue of the appropriate amount of sanctions and reasonable counsel fees and for written findings (see, Preferred Equities Corp. v Ziegelman, 190 A.D.2d 659). Thompson, J.P., Rosenblatt, Ritter, Friedmann and Krausman, JJ., concur.