From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cappone v. Morrissey

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Aug 24, 2018
16-CV-7170 (RRM) (SJB) (E.D.N.Y. Aug. 24, 2018)

Opinion

16-CV-7170 (RRM) (SJB)

08-24-2018

ERNESTO CAPPONE, Plaintiff, v. WILLIAM MORRISSEY; KEVIN KIM; LIBERTY MERCHANT GROUP; AND MERCHANT SOLUTIONS GROUP, Defendants.


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Plaintiff Ernesto Cappone brought this action against defendants William Morrissey, Michael Gallo, Kevin Kim, Liberty Merchant Group, Merchant Solutions Group, and World Business Lenders, LLC on December 29, 2016, alleging violations of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act ("RICO"), 18 U.S.C. § 1961 et seq., and various state laws. (Compl. (Doc. No. 1).) On July 14, 2017, the Clerk of Court issued a certificate of default against defendants Morrissey, Liberty Merchant Group, and Merchant Solutions Group; and Cappone subsequently moved for default judgment against those defendants. (Certificate of Default (Doc. No. 33).) This Court referred the motion to the Honorable Magistrate Judge Sanket J. Bulsara.

As the Report and Recommendation notes, Cappone voluntarily dismissed his claims against defendants Gallo and World Business Lenders, LLC. (R&R (Doc. No. 47) at 1 n.1.) --------

On July 27, 2018, Judge Bulsara issued a Report and Recommendation ("R&R") recommending that the Court deny default judgment and dismiss without prejudice Cappone's RICO causes of action for failure to state a claim, and further, that the Court decline supplemental jurisdiction over Cappone's state law claims. (R&R (Doc. No. 47) at 22-23.) Judge Bulsara reminded the parties that, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure ("Rule") 72(b), any objection to the R&R must be filed within fourteen days. (R&R at 24.) No party has filed objections, and the time to do so has now expired.

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and Rule 72(b), the Court has reviewed the R&R for clear error and, finding none, concurs with the R&R in its entirety. See Covey v. Simonton, 481 F. Supp. 2d 224, 226 (E.D.N.Y. 2007).

Accordingly, as to defendants Morrissey, Liberty Merchant Group, and Merchant Solutions Group, 1) the Clerk's entry of default is hereby vacated, 2) Cappone's motion for default judgment is denied, 3) all RICO claims are dismissed without prejudice, and 4) the Court declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over all remaining state law claims.

There are two remaining issues to address. First, Magistrate Bulsara directed Cappone,to file, by August 10, 2018, a stipulation of dismissal against the remaining defendant, Kevin Kim, who has appeared in this action pro se, or otherwise show cause as to why Cappone's claims against Kim should not be dismissed under Rule 41 as Cappone has not pursued his claims against Kim in any way since Kim filed his answer on June 28, 2017. (R&R at 1, n.1.) Cappone failed to comply with this Order. Out of an abundance of caution, the Court hereby orders Cappone to file, by August 31, 2018, a stipulation of dismissal against defendant Kim, or otherwise show cause as to why all claims against Kim should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute, or for failure to state a claim for the reasons set forth in Judge Bulsara's R&R. Cappone's failure to comply with this Order will result in dismissal of all remaining claims for failure to prosecute.

Finally, during the litigation on Cappone's motion for default judgment, Magistrate Judge Bulsara ordered Cappone to provide supplemental evidence, and Cappone failed to so do. As a result, Judge Bulsara ordered Cappone to show cause, by August 10, 2018, why sanctions should not issue pursuant to Rules 37 and 41. (R&R at 23-24.) Once again, Cappone failed to comply with Judge Bulsara's order. This Court will leave to Judge Bulsara the imposition of any sanctions for the violation of Judge Bulsara's order; however, Cappone's repeated failures to comply with court orders throughout this litigation will be taken into account should this Court reach the issue of dismissing the remaining claims for failure to prosecute as noted above.

The Clerk of Court is directed to mail a copy of this Order together with Judge Bulsara's Report and Recommendation to defendant Kevin Kim, and note the mailing on the docket.

SO ORDERED. Dated: Brooklyn, New York

August 24, 2018

Roslynn R . Mauskopf

ROSLYNN R. MAUSKOPF

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Cappone v. Morrissey

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Aug 24, 2018
16-CV-7170 (RRM) (SJB) (E.D.N.Y. Aug. 24, 2018)
Case details for

Cappone v. Morrissey

Case Details

Full title:ERNESTO CAPPONE, Plaintiff, v. WILLIAM MORRISSEY; KEVIN KIM; LIBERTY…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Date published: Aug 24, 2018

Citations

16-CV-7170 (RRM) (SJB) (E.D.N.Y. Aug. 24, 2018)

Citing Cases

Serrano v. Palacios

Morrissey, No. 16-CV-7170 (RRM) (SJB), 2018 WL 4055280, at *5 (E.D.N.Y. July 27, 2018), report and…