From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cappola v. Teitelbaum

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
May 1, 1906
77 N.E. 1183 (N.Y. 1906)

Opinion

Argued April 16, 1906

Decided May 1, 1906

Max Schleimer and Abraham B. Schleimer for appellant.

William Travers Jerome, District Attorney ( Robert S. Johnstone of counsel), for respondent.


Order of Appellate Division dismissing appeal from the order of the Trial Term punishing appellant for contempt modified so as to affirm said order, without costs, and as modified affirmed, without costs in this court. Appeal from order affirming order of Special Term dismissed, without costs; no opinion.

Concur: CULLEN, Ch. J., GRAY, EDWARD T. BARTLETT, HAIGHT, VANN, WILLARD BARTLETT and CHASE, JJ.


Summaries of

Cappola v. Teitelbaum

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
May 1, 1906
77 N.E. 1183 (N.Y. 1906)
Case details for

Cappola v. Teitelbaum

Case Details

Full title:ANTONIO CAPPOLA, Plaintiff, v . ADOLPH TEITELBAUM, Defendant. In the…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: May 1, 1906

Citations

77 N.E. 1183 (N.Y. 1906)
77 N.E. 1183

Citing Cases

Matter of Goodman v. Sala

, a magistrate of the city of New York appeals from an order denying his motion to vacate a resettled order…

Douglas v. Adel

The court observed that an affidavit submitted by the appellant could not be treated as taking the place of a…