From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cappello v. Cappello

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Aug 13, 2001
286 A.D.2d 360 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)

Opinion

Submitted June 18, 2001.

August 13, 2001.

In a matrimonial action in which the parties were divorced by judgment entered July 26, 1999, which incorporated but did not merge the terms of a stipulation of settlement entered on the record in open court on January 26, 1999, the defendant former husband appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Scancarelli, J.), dated August 15, 2000, as granted the motion of the plaintiff former wife to modify the stipulation of settlement and the judgment of divorce.

Eugene Cappello, Carmel, N.Y., appellant pro se.

Kathleen Cappello, Bedford Hills, N.Y., respondent pro se.

Before: FRED T. SANTUCCI, J.P., GLORIA GOLDSTEIN, ANITA R. FLORIO, STEPHEN G. CRANE, JJ.


ORDERED that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, without costs or disbursements, and the motion is denied.

A stipulation entered into in open court, with the parties and counsel present, is a binding contract (see, Carroll v. Carroll, 236 A.D.2d 353; Blake v. Blake, 229 A.D.2d 509; Bellefleur v. Gervais, 201 A.D.2d 523, 524; Barzin v. Barzin, 158 A.D.2d 769, 770). A court cannot rewrite the agreement if the parties have not assented to such a reformation (see, Tinter v. Tinter, 96 A.D.2d 556, 557; Martino v. Martino, 103 A.D.2d 842; Vranick v. Vranick, 41 A.D.2d 663; Matter of Cuffee v. Miller, 243 A.D.2d 563).

SANTUCCI, J.P., GOLDSTEIN, FLORIO and CRANE, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Cappello v. Cappello

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Aug 13, 2001
286 A.D.2d 360 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
Case details for

Cappello v. Cappello

Case Details

Full title:KATHLEEN CAPPELLO, respondent, v. EUGENE CAPPELLO, appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Aug 13, 2001

Citations

286 A.D.2d 360 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
729 N.Y.S.2d 175

Citing Cases

T.P. v. S.P.

A court cannot reform an agreement to conform to what it thinks is proper, if the parties have not assented…

Tamburello v. Tamburello

m the four corners of the instrument, and not from extrinsic evidence’ ” (Ackermann v. Ackermann, 82 A.D.3d…