From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Capital Outdoor v. Guilford Cty. Bd. of Adjustment

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Mar 1, 2002
355 N.C. 269 (N.C. 2002)

Summary

adopting the standard of review stated in dissenting opinion

Summary of this case from Early v. County of Durham, Dep't of Soc. Servs

Opinion

No. 603A01

Filed 7 March 2002

No headnotes.

Appeal pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 7A-30(2) from the decision of a divided panel of the Court of Appeals, 146 N.C. App. 388, 552 S.E.2d 265 (2001), reversing and remanding a judgment filed 27 April 2000 by Johnson (Marcus L.), J., in Superior Court, Guilford County. Heard in the Supreme Court 13 February 2002.

Waller, Stroud, Stewart Araneda, LLP, by Betty S. Waller, for petitioner-appellee.

Guilford County Attorney's Office, by Jonathan V. Maxwell, County Attorney, and Mercedes O. Chut, Deputy County Attorney, for respondent-appellant.


For the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion, we reverse the decision of the Court of Appeals as to the standard of review and remand the case to that court for consideration of the other assignments of error on the merits.

REVERSED.


Summaries of

Capital Outdoor v. Guilford Cty. Bd. of Adjustment

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Mar 1, 2002
355 N.C. 269 (N.C. 2002)

adopting the standard of review stated in dissenting opinion

Summary of this case from Early v. County of Durham, Dep't of Soc. Servs

reversing per curiam "[f]or the reasons, stated in the dissenting opinion" at 146 N.C. App. 388, 393, 552 S.E.2d 265, 268 which states, "an appellate court's obligation to review a superior court order for errors of law . . . can be accomplished by addressing the dispositive issue before the agency and the superior court without examining the scope of review utilized by the superior court."

Summary of this case from Broadhurst v. Tatum
Case details for

Capital Outdoor v. Guilford Cty. Bd. of Adjustment

Case Details

Full title:CAPITAL OUTDOOR, INC., Petitioner v. GUILFORD COUNTY BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT…

Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina

Date published: Mar 1, 2002

Citations

355 N.C. 269 (N.C. 2002)
559 S.E.2d 547

Citing Cases

Broadhurst v. Tatum

See Shackleford-Moten at 572, 573 S.E.2d at 770 (stating "the appellate court need only consider those…

Prewitt v. Town of Wrightsville Beach

an appellate court's obligation to review a superior court order for errors of law can be accomplished by…