From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Capital One Bank, N.A. v. Faracco

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Apr 20, 2017
149 A.D.3d 590 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)

Opinion

04-20-2017

CAPITAL ONE BANK, N.A., Plaintiff–Respondent, v. John FARACCO, Defendant–Appellant, Thomas Marron, et al., Defendants.

Law Offices of Charles H. Wallshein, Melville (Charles W. Marino of counsel), for appellant. Parker Ibrahim & Berg LLC, New York (Anthony W. Vaughn Jr. of counsel), for respondent.


Law Offices of Charles H. Wallshein, Melville (Charles W. Marino of counsel), for appellant.

Parker Ibrahim & Berg LLC, New York (Anthony W. Vaughn Jr. of counsel), for respondent.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Joan M. Kenney, J.), entered July 1, 2016, which denied the motion of defendant John Farracco to dismiss the complaint on the ground of lack of personal jurisdiction, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The filing of a notice of appearance by counsel on defendant's behalf, after the time to answer had expired, and without making any objection to personal jurisdiction, waived defendant's challenge to such jurisdiction. Accordingly, the court properly denied defendant's motion, made four months after such appearance (see Matter of Nicola v. Board of Assessors of Town of N. Elba, 46 A.D.3d 1161, 847 N.Y.S.2d 763 [3d Dept.2007] ).

We have considered defendant's remaining arguments and find them unavailing.

ACOSTA, J.P., MAZZARELLI, MANZANET–DANIELS, GISCHE, KAHN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Capital One Bank, N.A. v. Faracco

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Apr 20, 2017
149 A.D.3d 590 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)
Case details for

Capital One Bank, N.A. v. Faracco

Case Details

Full title:CAPITAL ONE BANK, N.A., Plaintiff–Respondent, v. John FARACCO…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.

Date published: Apr 20, 2017

Citations

149 A.D.3d 590 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)
2017 N.Y. Slip Op. 3062
50 N.Y.S.3d 285

Citing Cases

Virga v. Virga

While Respondent is permitted to raise harassment as an affirmative defense in his answer, he is not entitled…

Servs. for the Underserved v. Mohammed

To this point, courts routinely find that when a party waits to raise a personal jurisdiction defense, after…