From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Capital Associates v. Gallopade Enterprises Inter'l

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Oct 31, 1984
323 S.E.2d 842 (Ga. Ct. App. 1984)

Opinion

68993.

DECIDED OCTOBER 31, 1984.

Lease agreement. DeKalb State Court. Before Judge Seeliger.

Marshall H. Jaffe, for appellant.

Wayne B. Magnum, for appellee.


The plaintiff-appellant sued to recover damages for the defendant-appellee's alleged failure to make rental payments in accordance with the terms of a lease agreement pertaining to a copying machine. This appeal is from the grant of the defendant's motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction.

The defendant's business is located in Greenville, S.C., and it ordered the copier in that state. Although the defendant's president averred that she placed the order through a company known as Action Copy Systems, Inc., and that no mention was made of any involvement by the plaintiff in the transaction, the lease contract was subsequently accepted by the plaintiff at its office in Atlanta, Georgia; and the defendant subsequently complied with instructions to mail the rental payments directly to the plaintiff's office. The plaintiff contends that the trial court was authorized under these circumstances to exercise "long-arm" jurisdiction over the defendant pursuant to OCGA § 9-10-91 (1). Held:

"Mere telephone or mail contact with an out-of-state defendant, or even the defendant's visits to this state [are] insufficient to establish the purposeful activity with Georgia required by the `Long Arm' Statute. [Cits.]" Wise v. State Board c. of Architects, 247 Ga. 206, 209 ( 274 S.E.2d 544) (1981). Absent any evidence that the defendant negotiated the lease agreement in this state, or signed it here, or otherwise transacted business here, the court acted properly in dismissing the complaint for lack of personal jurisdiction. Accord Superior Fertilizer Chemical v. Warren, 162 Ga. App. 595, 597 ( 292 S.E.2d 430) (1982); Graphic Machinery v. H. M. S. Direct Mail Service, 158 Ga. App. 599, 600 ( 281 S.E.2d 343) (1981).

Judgment affirmed. Pope and Benham, JJ., concur.


DECIDED OCTOBER 31, 1984.


Summaries of

Capital Associates v. Gallopade Enterprises Inter'l

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Oct 31, 1984
323 S.E.2d 842 (Ga. Ct. App. 1984)
Case details for

Capital Associates v. Gallopade Enterprises Inter'l

Case Details

Full title:CAPITAL ASSOCIATES, INC. v. GALLOPADE ENTERPRISES INTERNATIONAL, INC

Court:Court of Appeals of Georgia

Date published: Oct 31, 1984

Citations

323 S.E.2d 842 (Ga. Ct. App. 1984)
323 S.E.2d 842

Citing Cases

Commercial Food Specialties v. Quality Food Equip

Therefore, the court acted properly in dismissing the plaintiff's complaint for lack of personal…

Commercial Casualty Insurance v. BSE Management, Inc.

Under Georgia law, mere telephone or mail contact with an out-of-state defendant is insufficient to establish…