From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cantwell v. United States

Circuit Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Oct 8, 1947
163 F.2d 782 (4th Cir. 1947)

Opinion

No. 5641.

October 8, 1947.

Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Wheeling; William E. Baker, Judge.

Lulu Mae Burdine Cantwell and others were convicted on a plea of guilty of violating the Mann Act, and they appeal.

Affirmed.

Carl G. Bachmann and Frank A. O'Brien, both of Wheeling, W.Va., for appellants.

Wayne T. Brooks, Asst. U.S. Atty., of Wheeling, W. Va. (C. Lee Spillers, U.S. Atty., of Wheeling, W. Va., on the brief), for appellee.

Before PARKER, SOPER, and DOBIE, Circuit Judges.


This is an appeal from a sentence entered upon a plea of guilty of violating the Mann Act, 18 U.S.C.A. § 399. The only question presented by the appeal is whether the court abused its discretion in refusing to permit appellants to withdraw their plea of guilty. No abuse of discretion is shown. On the contrary, the evidence before the court was clearly sufficient to establish guilt on the part of appellants and they offered no evidence to establish their innocence.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Cantwell v. United States

Circuit Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Oct 8, 1947
163 F.2d 782 (4th Cir. 1947)
Case details for

Cantwell v. United States

Case Details

Full title:CANTWELL et al. v. UNITED STATES

Court:Circuit Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Date published: Oct 8, 1947

Citations

163 F.2d 782 (4th Cir. 1947)

Citing Cases

Hoyt v. United States

United States v. Colonna. 3 Cir., 142 F.2d 210, 211; Bergen v. United States, 8 Cir., 145 F.2d 181, 186-187.…