From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cantor Fitzgerald & Co. v. 8an Capital Partners Master Fund, L.P.

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Oct 1, 2015
132 A.D.3d 402 (N.Y. App. Div. 2015)

Opinion

15532 156559/14

10-01-2015

Cantor Fitzgerald & Co., Plaintiff-Respondent, v. 8an Capital Partners Master Fund, L.P., et al., Defendants, Philip Eytan, Defendant-Appellant.

David Bolton, P.C., Garden City (David Bolton of counsel), for appellant. Cantor Fitzgerald & Co., New York (Michael S. Popok of counsel), for respondent.


David Bolton, P.C., Garden City (David Bolton of counsel), for appellant.

Cantor Fitzgerald & Co., New York (Michael S. Popok of counsel), for respondent.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Melvin L. Schweitzer, J.), entered January 16, 2015, which denied defendant Philip Eytan's motion to dismiss the complaint as against him, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, the motion granted, and the complaint dismissed. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment accordingly.

The motion court should have granted defendant's motion.

The complaint alleges that defendant knew of and participated in the alleged fraudulent transfer of assets but fails to allege that he is the transferee, and further fails to allege, in anything other than conclusory fashion, that he benefited from the transfer, as required to state a cause of action for fraudulent conveyance (Debtor and Creditor Law §§ 273, 276; Federal Deposit Ins. Corp. v Porco, 75 NY2d 840, 842 [1990]; Symbax, Inc. v Bingaman, 219 AD2d 552, 553-554 [1st Dept 1995]). Moreover, while defendant is an officer of both defendant transferor and transferee corporations, "receipt of a salary from the transferee corporation as an officer of the corporation is not sufficient to render the officer a transferee or beneficiary of the transfer" (D'Mel & Assoc. v Athco, Inc., 105 AD3d 451, 452-453 [1st Dept 2013] [internal quotation marks and citation omitted]). As there are no other nonconclusory allegations sufficient to hold defendant individually liable for the fraudulent transfer, the complaint should be dismissed as against him (see Riback v Margulis, 43 AD3d 1023, 1023 [2d Dept 2007]).

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.

ENTERED: OCTOBER 1, 2015

CLERK


Summaries of

Cantor Fitzgerald & Co. v. 8an Capital Partners Master Fund, L.P.

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Oct 1, 2015
132 A.D.3d 402 (N.Y. App. Div. 2015)
Case details for

Cantor Fitzgerald & Co. v. 8an Capital Partners Master Fund, L.P.

Case Details

Full title:Cantor Fitzgerald & Co., Plaintiff-Respondent, v. 8an Capital Partners…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.

Date published: Oct 1, 2015

Citations

132 A.D.3d 402 (N.Y. App. Div. 2015)
2015 N.Y. Slip Op. 7046
16 N.Y.S.3d 733

Citing Cases

Cantor Fitzgerald & Co. v. 8an Capital Partners Master Fund L.P.

As such, the complaint alleges that the transfer by the Fund Judgment Debtor to Capital Partners, an entity…

Swartz v. Swartz

For the same reasons, the Supreme Court properly granted that branch of the Swartz defendants' motion which…