From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Canton Twp. v. Kaufman

Michigan Court of Appeals
Jan 3, 1979
87 Mich. App. 719 (Mich. Ct. App. 1979)

Opinion

Docket No. 77-4284.

Decided January 3, 1979. Leave to appeal applied for.

Travis, Warren, Nayer Burgoyne, P.C. (by John M. Roche), for plaintiff.

Felix S. Kubik, for defendants.

Before: ALLEN, P.J., and R.M. MAHER and J.E. TOWNSEND, JJ.

Circuit judge, sitting on the Court of Appeals by assignment.


Plaintiff brought this condemnation action against the defendants on June 15, 1973. Prior to trial the defendants incurred substantial legal expenses in challenging the authority of the plaintiff to acquire property through condemnation proceedings without a referendum of the people. Prior to trial the plaintiff filed a notice of discontinuance of the action. Defendants filed motions for attorney fees and appraisal preparation fees. The trial court awarded attorney fees in the amount of $7,548.25 and appraisal fees in the amount of $8,000. Plaintiff appeals, alleging that the award of attorney fees was improper.

It has long been the rule that attorney fees may not be taxed and awarded as costs in condemnation cases unless specifically authorized by statute or by court rule, Hester v Commissioners of Parks and Boulevards of the City of Detroit, 84 Mich. 450; 47 N.W. 1097 (1891); Detroit Edison Co v Janosz, 350 Mich. 606; 87 N.W.2d 126 (1957). In condemnation cases, except those dismissed after the jury is impaneled, attorney fees are authorized by MCL 213.37; MSA 8.27, only up to a maximum of $25. No jury having been impaneled in this case, the award of attorney fees may not exceed $25.

Cases dismissed after a jury has been impaneled are governed by MCL 213.38; MSA 8.28, which authorizes reasonable attorney fees.

Defendants contend that the rule regarding attorney fees in condemnation cases was abrogated by the adoption of GCR 1963, 504.1(2), which confers upon the trial court the power to dismiss upon motion of the plaintiff upon such terms and conditions as it deems just and proper. While this rule may empower the court to tax costs as a condition of dismissal, it may still tax only those costs authorized by statute, GCR 1963, 526.1. Attorney fees are taxable only as authorized by statute, MCL 600.2405; MSA 27A.2405.

We are not unsympathetic to defendants' plight. They have gone to considerable expense preparing to defend an action which was dismissed over their objection, with no guarantee that they will not be subjected to a new proceeding with its attendant expense. However, we are bound by the statutes and court rules. In the case at bar, the applicable statute authorizes attorney fees up to a maximum of $25, MCL 213.37; MSA 8.27. The trial court erred in awarding a greater amount as attorney fees.

The award of attorney fees is reversed. We remand to the trial court for an award of attorney fees not to exceed $25. Plaintiff may tax its costs of appeal.


Summaries of

Canton Twp. v. Kaufman

Michigan Court of Appeals
Jan 3, 1979
87 Mich. App. 719 (Mich. Ct. App. 1979)
Case details for

Canton Twp. v. Kaufman

Case Details

Full title:CHARTER TOWNSHIP OF CANTON v KAUFMAN

Court:Michigan Court of Appeals

Date published: Jan 3, 1979

Citations

87 Mich. App. 719 (Mich. Ct. App. 1979)
276 N.W.2d 505

Citing Cases

Escanaba L.S.R. Co. v. Keweenaw

I. DID THE TRIAL COURT ERR IN HOLDING THAT DEFENDANTS ARE ENTITLED TO REIMBURSEMENT OF ATTORNEY FEES AND…

Davis v. Koch

" Plaintiffs argue that the trial judge was without power to impose payment of attorney fees as a condition…