From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Campbell v. State

Court of Appeals of Alabama
Jun 12, 1928
22 Ala. App. 493 (Ala. Crim. App. 1928)

Opinion

7 Div. 449.

June 12, 1928.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Cherokee County; W. W. Haralson, Judge.

Will Campbell was convicted of violating the prohibition law, and he appeals. Reversed and remanded.

Charlie C. McCall, Atty. Gen., for the State.

Brief did not reach the Reporter.


The first count of the indictment charged that the defendant manufactured whisky. The second count that he was in the unlawful possession of a still. The verdict of the jury was:

"We, the jury, find the defendant guilty of distilling as charged in count 2 of the indictment."

The judgment of the court followed the verdict. The second count of the indictment did not charge "distilling" and will not support either the verdict of the jury or the judgment of the court thereon. The orderly administration of justice requires certainty and accuracy in the rendition and recording judgments, both for the protection of the public and for the defendant. The judgment is erroneous and is reversed, and the cause is remanded.

Reversed and remanded.


Summaries of

Campbell v. State

Court of Appeals of Alabama
Jun 12, 1928
22 Ala. App. 493 (Ala. Crim. App. 1928)
Case details for

Campbell v. State

Case Details

Full title:CAMPBELL v. STATE

Court:Court of Appeals of Alabama

Date published: Jun 12, 1928

Citations

22 Ala. App. 493 (Ala. Crim. App. 1928)
117 So. 396

Citing Cases

Mauldin v. State

A verdict finding defendant guilty of one offense under an indictment for a different offense cannot stand.…

Phillips v. State

We have refused to apply the provisions of the statute when this situation was not present or apparent. See…