From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Campbell v. Johnson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Aug 23, 1999
264 A.D.2d 461 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)

Opinion

August 23, 1999.

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Gowan, J.).


Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, without costs or disbursements, and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, for a hearing to determine whether personal jurisdiction over the defendant was obtained in the action, and for a new determination of the motion.

The Supreme Court erred in denying the defendant's motion for leave to vacate the default judgment entered against him on the ground that he submitted photocopied and not original affidavits in support of the motion ( see, CPLR 2101 [e]; Matter of Lamont D., 247 A.D.2d 615; Matter of Samuel E., 240 A.D.2d 251).

In his affidavit in support of the motion, the defendant stated that he was never served with the summons and complaint and that he first became aware of the judgment when his employer received an income execution. The affidavit of the process server indicates that the defendant was personally served at his place of business. In view of the conflicting affidavits, a hearing is necessary to determine whether the defendant was served with the summons and complaint.

If service was not effected, then the default judgment must be vacated unconditionally ( see, Akhtar v. Cavalieri, 255 A.D.2d 275; Taylor v. Jones, 172 A.D.2d 745; Anello v. Barry, 149 A.D.2d 640). Conversely, if the defendant was properly served, there is no excuse for his default and the motion should be denied ( see, Taylor v. Jones, supra).

O'Brien, J. P., Ritter, Joy, Altman and Smith, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Campbell v. Johnson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Aug 23, 1999
264 A.D.2d 461 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
Case details for

Campbell v. Johnson

Case Details

Full title:MICHELLE CAMPBELL, Respondent, v. JEFFREY JOHNSON, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Aug 23, 1999

Citations

264 A.D.2d 461 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
694 N.Y.S.2d 151

Citing Cases

Rechler Equity B-1, LLC v. AKR Corp.

CPLR 2101, entitled “Form of papers,” specifically states, at section (e) thereof, that “ copies, rather than…

Principale v. Lewner

[2] Courts that have mentioned CPLR 3116 (e) in their decisions have been faced with situations where a party…