Opinion
8 Div. 135.
November 28, 1918.
Appeal from Circuit Court, Madison County; Robert C. Brickell, Judge.
Taylor Watts, of Huntsville, for appellant.
Griffin Ford, of Huntsville, for appellee.
Whether or not defendant's contract with plaintiff included a stipulation insuring the safety of the hired mules, as charged in the third count, was properly submitted to the jury, and the evidence was clearly sufficient to support a finding for plaintiff under that count. But the evidence is utterly without tendency to show that the mule was injured as the result of any negligence on the part of defendant or his servant.
We think the trial court erred in refusing defendant's requested instructions as to the first and second counts; and, as we cannot know under what count the jury found for plaintiff, the error must work a reversal of the judgment.
Reversed and remanded.
ANDERSON, C. J., and MAYFIELD and THOMAS, JJ., concur.