From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Campbell v. Blum

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jan 18, 1983
91 A.D.2d 937 (N.Y. App. Div. 1983)

Summary

In Campbell v Blum (91 AD2d 937 [1st Dept 1983]), plaintiffs sought a declaratory judgment that the proprietors of an adult home may not involuntarily evict a resident, except upon service of a 30-day written notice containing the alleged cause for eviction and commencement of a special proceeding in accordance with section 461-h of the Social Services Law. The Court held that legislation enacted subsequent to the commencement of the action, requiring due process prior to eviction, rendered the action moot (id.).

Summary of this case from Libraries v. Marx

Opinion

January 18, 1983


Order and judgment (one paper), Supreme Court, New York County (Gabel, J.), entered November 2, 1981, which, inter alia: (1) granted plaintiffs' motion for a declaratory judgment to the extent of declaring, among other things: (a) that the action of private proprietors of adult homes in evicting or in attempting to evict residents constitutes "State action" within the purview of the due process clause and (b) that the proprietors of an adult home may not involuntarily evict a resident, except upon service of a 30-day written notice containing the alleged cause for eviction and commencement of a special proceeding in accordance with section 461-h of the New York State Social Services Law; and, (2) sua sponte dismissed the complaint of the individual plaintiff Jay Nelson Campbell, insofar as it sought money damages, is unanimously reversed, judgment vacated, and this action dismissed as moot, without prejudice to any action which plaintiff may bring against a proprietor of an adult home, without costs. In essence, the plaintiffs brought this action for the purpose of protecting residents of adult homes from arbitrary eviction. Since by statute (see L 1981, ch 983) due process is insured to a resident of this type of home before their admission agreement may be involuntarily terminated, this appeal has now been rendered moot. The effect of our dismissal is "`to erase the whole case from the books'" ( Matter of Park East Corp. v Whelan, 43 N.Y.2d 735, 736; Matter of Two Lincoln Sq. Assoc. v New York City Conciliation Appeals Bd., 75 A.D.2d 751). Were we to reach the merits, we would find no "State action" and no cause of action for damages against the State.

Concur — Kupferman, J.P., Ross, Fein and Alexander, JJ.


Summaries of

Campbell v. Blum

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jan 18, 1983
91 A.D.2d 937 (N.Y. App. Div. 1983)

In Campbell v Blum (91 AD2d 937 [1st Dept 1983]), plaintiffs sought a declaratory judgment that the proprietors of an adult home may not involuntarily evict a resident, except upon service of a 30-day written notice containing the alleged cause for eviction and commencement of a special proceeding in accordance with section 461-h of the Social Services Law. The Court held that legislation enacted subsequent to the commencement of the action, requiring due process prior to eviction, rendered the action moot (id.).

Summary of this case from Libraries v. Marx

In Campbell v Blum (91 AD2d 937 [1st Dept 1983]), plaintiffs sought a declaratory judgment that the proprietors of an adult home may not involuntarily evict a resident, except upon service of a 30-day written notice containing the alleged cause for eviction and commencement of a special proceeding in accordance with section 461-h of the Social Services Law. The Court held that legislation enacted subsequent to the commencement of the action, requiring due process prior to eviction, rendered the action moot (id.).

Summary of this case from Libraries v. Marx
Case details for

Campbell v. Blum

Case Details

Full title:JAY N. CAMPBELL, Individually on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jan 18, 1983

Citations

91 A.D.2d 937 (N.Y. App. Div. 1983)

Citing Cases

State of New York v. Myers

Moreover, the 2008 postrelease supervision legislation, which was signed into law on June 30, 2008, renders…

State of New York v. Myers

Moreover, the 2008 postrelease supervision legislation, which was signed into law on June 30, 2008, renders…