From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Campbell Specialty Co. v. Hacker

Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Dec 14, 2010
245 P.3d 617 (Okla. 2010)

Opinion

No. 106,572.

December 14, 2010.

Steve A. Weeks, McClure Law Firm, Oklahoma City, OK, for Petitioner.

J. Kord Hammert, Oklahoma City, OK, for Respondent Stephen Hacker.


ON CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS, DIVISION 3

¶ 0 Claimant/Respondent, Stephen Hacker, seeks review of an opinion of the Oklahoma Court of Civil Appeals, Division III, granting employer's statute-of-limitation defense. We granted Respondent's Petition for Certiorari.

CERTIORARI PREVIOUSLY GRANTED; OPINION OF THE COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS VACATED; WORKERS' COMPENSATION COURT ORDER SUSTAINED.


¶ 1 This proceeding concerns provisions of 85 O.S. § 43[ 85-43](A) which permit a workers' compensation claim to be filed within two years of injury, unless a worker's employment has terminated, in which case, the claim must be filed within six months of termination. In Ponca Iron Metal, Inc. v. Jackie Wilkinson and the Workers' Compensation Court, 2010 OK 75, 242 P.3d 534, this Court found 85 O.S. Supp. 2005 § 43[ 85-43](A) unconstitutional holding:

In the present matter, the amendment in question brings § 43 squarely within the special law prohibition of Art. 5, § 46. The classification of injured employees on the basis of continued versus terminated employment is a false and deficient classification of the larger class of injured employees because it creates preference for members in the continued employment group and results in unequal treatment for certain members of the terminated group that bear no reasonable relationship to curtailing retaliatory claims or preventing stale claims. Hence, we find the action of the Legislature to be unreasonable in their creation of this particular statutory classification. We hold the 2005 amendment to § 43(A) adding the six-month statutory limitations period is unconstitutional.

2010 OK 75 at ¶ 7, 242 P.3d 534.

¶ 2 In the present matter, the Court of Civil Appeals found this statute constitutional. We must therefore vacate their finding and sustain the order of the Workers' Compensation Court which found this statute unconstitutional.

CERTIORARI PREVIOUSLY GRANTED; OPINION OF THE COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS VACATED; WORKERS' COMPENSATION COURT ORDER SUSTAINED.

¶ 3 CONCUR: EDMONDSON, C.J., HARGRAVE, KAUGER, WATT, COLBERT, REIF, JJ.

¶ 4 DISSENT: TAYLOR, V.C.J., WINCHESTER, J.


Summaries of

Campbell Specialty Co. v. Hacker

Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Dec 14, 2010
245 P.3d 617 (Okla. 2010)
Case details for

Campbell Specialty Co. v. Hacker

Case Details

Full title:CAMPBELL SPECIALTY CO., INC., and Compsource Oklahoma, Petitioners, v…

Court:Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Date published: Dec 14, 2010

Citations

245 P.3d 617 (Okla. 2010)
2010 OK 87