Opinion
Argued April 22, 1892
Decided May 6, 1892
Robert H. Griffin for appellant.
Eugene H. Lewis for respondent.
Agree to affirm on opinion of VAN BRUNT, J., in General Term.
All concur.
Judgment affirmed.
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
Cammerer v. Muller
Court of Appeals of the State of New York
May 6, 1892
133 N.Y. 623 (N.Y. 1892)
Summaries of
Cammerer v. Muller
Court of Appeals of the State of New York
May 6, 1892
133 N.Y. 623 (N.Y. 1892)
Case details for
Cammerer v. Muller
Case Details
Full title:CAROLINE J. CAMMERER, Respondent, v . CLEMENS MULLER, Appellant
Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Date published: May 6, 1892
Citations
133 N.Y. 623 (N.Y. 1892)
44 N.Y. St. Rptr. 932
Citing Cases
McQuillen v. Evans
In such case the promisor cannot avail himself of the fraudulent concealment of his marriage as a defense to…
Delisi v. FicarrottaA contrary rule would, as well said by Van Brunt, P.J., "be offering a premium upon villainy." Cammerer v.…