From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Camina v. Parliament Ins. Co.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Aug 10, 1982
417 So. 2d 1093 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1982)

Summary

finding evidence that ice cream was thawed, dirty, and splattered equally susceptible to an inference that the condition existed before the plaintiff's fall as it was to the inference that plaintiff's fall created the condition

Summary of this case from Norman v. DCI Biologicals Dunedin, LLC

Opinion

No. 81-2751.

August 10, 1982.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Dade County, Mario Goderich, J.

Horton, Perse Ginsberg and Arnold R. Ginsberg, Brumer, Cohen, Logan Kandell, Miami, for appellants.

Underwood, Gillis, Karcher, Reinert Valle and Stephen E. Tunstall, Miami, for appellees.

Before NESBITT, BASKIN and DANIEL S. PEARSON, JJ.


We reverse the trial court's order directing a verdict for the defendant upon a holding that notwithstanding the plaintiff's inability to elicit direct testimony as to the length of time that the thawed ice cream upon which she slipped and fell had been on the floor of the entranceway to the defendant's store, an area which a storekeeper has a duty to maintain with the exercise of ordinary and reasonable care, Burmeister v. American Motorists Insurance Co., 403 So.2d 541 (Fla. 4th DCA 1981); circumstantial evidence is sufficient to show that a dangerous condition existed for such a length of time so as to charge the storeowner with constructive notice, Schmidt v. Bowl American Florida, Inc., 358 So.2d 1385 (Fla. 4th DCA 1978); Winn Dixie Stores, Inc. v. Williams, 264 So.2d 862 (Fla. 3d DCA 1972); and the evidence here that, inter alia, the ice cream was thawed, dirty and splattered, although susceptible of the inference that the plaintiff's slip and fall had created the condition, was equally susceptible of the inference that the condition existed beforehand, Montgomery v. Florida Jitney Jungle Stores, Inc., 281 So.2d 302 (Fla. 1973); Burmeister v. American Motorists Insurance Co., supra; Grizzard v. Colonial Stores, Inc., 330 So.2d 768 (Fla. 1st DCA 1976); Lee v. Southland Corporation, 253 So.2d 268 (Fla. 2d DCA 1971), so as to make the issue of the defendant's constructive notice of the condition one to be resolved by a jury, Montgomery v. Florida Jitney Jungle Stores, Inc., supra.

Reversed and remanded.


Summaries of

Camina v. Parliament Ins. Co.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Aug 10, 1982
417 So. 2d 1093 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1982)

finding evidence that ice cream was thawed, dirty, and splattered equally susceptible to an inference that the condition existed before the plaintiff's fall as it was to the inference that plaintiff's fall created the condition

Summary of this case from Norman v. DCI Biologicals Dunedin, LLC

finding that plaintiff's slip and fall on thawed ice cream, which was "dirty and splattered," was "susceptible of the inference that the condition existed beforehand ... so as to make the issue of the defendant's constructive notice of the condition one to be resolved by the jury"

Summary of this case from Wilson-Greene v. City of Miami
Case details for

Camina v. Parliament Ins. Co.

Case Details

Full title:MARY CAMINA AND LEO CAMINA, HER HUSBAND, APPELLANTS, v. PARLIAMENT…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Aug 10, 1982

Citations

417 So. 2d 1093 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1982)

Citing Cases

Winn Dixie Stores, Inc. v. Pittman

Affirmed. See Camina v. Parliament Ins. Co., 417 So.2d 1093 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982); Marlowe v. Food Fair Stores,…

Winn Dixie Stores, Inc. v. Benton

Under such circumstances the issue is for the jury to resolve even where the evidence may be susceptible of…