From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cameo Quality Homes of Woodbury, Inc. v. Thuringer

United States District Court, D. Minnesota
May 11, 2007
Civil No. 07-340 (JNE-JJG) (D. Minn. May. 11, 2007)

Opinion

Civil No. 07-340 (JNE-JJG).

May 11, 2007


ORDER


This matter is before the undersigned upon the report and recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. No objections have been filed to that report and recommendation in the time period permitted. Based on the report and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, and being duly advised of all the files, records, and proceedings herein, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:

1. The Thuringers' motion for judgment on the pleadings (Doc. No. 13) is GRANTED.
2. Cameo's motion for partial summary judgment (Doc. No. 24) is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART.
3. All the claims in Cameo's complaint are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
4. The counterclaim for breach of contract in the Thuringers' answer is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.


Summaries of

Cameo Quality Homes of Woodbury, Inc. v. Thuringer

United States District Court, D. Minnesota
May 11, 2007
Civil No. 07-340 (JNE-JJG) (D. Minn. May. 11, 2007)
Case details for

Cameo Quality Homes of Woodbury, Inc. v. Thuringer

Case Details

Full title:Cameo Quality Homes of Woodbury, Inc., Plaintiff, v. John Thuringer…

Court:United States District Court, D. Minnesota

Date published: May 11, 2007

Citations

Civil No. 07-340 (JNE-JJG) (D. Minn. May. 11, 2007)

Citing Cases

Olympus Ins. Co. v. AON Benfield, Inc.

A lack of consideration means that no contract was ever formed; a failure of consideration, by contrast,…

Donner v. Alcoa Inc.

Rule 12(c) provides that, after the pleadings are closed but a reasonable time prior to trial, a party may…