From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Call Center Solutions v. Malson

Connecticut Superior Court, Judicial District of Danbury
May 11, 2001
2001 Ct. Sup. 6176 (Conn. Super. Ct. 2001)

Opinion

No. CV000339425S

May 11, 2001


MEMORANDUM OF DECISION


The defendants, Rex Malson and Call Center Consulting, Inc., move to dismiss the complaint on the ground that the court lacks personal jurisdiction over the defendants. The defendants, residents of Ohio, assert that the complaint is devoid of any allegations that would confer personal jurisdiction over them under General Statutes § 52-59b.

Attached to the plaintiffs complaint is a copy of an agreement between the plaintiff and the defendants. The agreement, the validity of which is undisputed by the defendants, contains a forum selection clause that states: "[a]ny dispute or cause of action that arises or is related to this Agreement shall be brought in any court of competent jurisdiction located in Fairfield County, Connecticut." Thus, this court will give effect to the forum selection clause, thereby conferring personal jurisdiction over the defendants. United States Trust Co. v. Bohart, 197 Conn. 34, 42, 495 A.2d 1034 (1985) ("[a]bsent a showing of fraud or overreaching, such forum clauses will be enforced by the courts.").

Accordingly, the defendants' motions to dismiss

Hiller, J.


Summaries of

Call Center Solutions v. Malson

Connecticut Superior Court, Judicial District of Danbury
May 11, 2001
2001 Ct. Sup. 6176 (Conn. Super. Ct. 2001)
Case details for

Call Center Solutions v. Malson

Case Details

Full title:CALL CENTER SOLUTIONS, INC. v. REX MALSON AND CALL CENTER CONSULTING, INC

Court:Connecticut Superior Court, Judicial District of Danbury

Date published: May 11, 2001

Citations

2001 Ct. Sup. 6176 (Conn. Super. Ct. 2001)

Citing Cases

LucidRisk, LLC v. Ogden

Connecticut courts continue to recognize that a party to a contract may voluntarily submit to the exercise of…