From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

California v. Washington

U.S.
Nov 10, 1958
358 U.S. 64 (1958)

Opinion

ON MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE BILL OF COMPLAINT.

No. 12, Original.

Argued October 15-16, 1958. Decided November 10, 1958.

Motion for leave to file bill of complaint denied.

Wallace Howland, Assistant Attorney General of California, argued the cause for plaintiff. With him on the brief were Edmund G. Brown, Attorney General, and Leonard M. Sperry, Jr., Deputy Attorney General.

John J. O'Connell, Attorney General of Washington, and Thomas R. Garlington argued the cause for defendant. With them on the brief was Franklin K. Thorp, Assistant Attorney General.

Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney General, and Paxton Blair, Solicitor General, filed a brief for the State of New York, as amicus curiae, in support of the position taken by the plaintiff in its complaint.


The motion for leave to file bill of complaint is denied. U.S. Const., Amend. XXI, § 2; Indianapolis Brewing Co. v. Liquor Control Commission, 305 U.S. 391; Joseph S. Finch Co. v. McKittrick, 305 U.S. 395; Mahoney v. Joseph Triner Corp., 304 U.S. 401; State Board of California v. Young's Market Co., 299 U.S. 59.


Summaries of

California v. Washington

U.S.
Nov 10, 1958
358 U.S. 64 (1958)
Case details for

California v. Washington

Case Details

Full title:CALIFORNIA v . WASHINGTON

Court:U.S.

Date published: Nov 10, 1958

Citations

358 U.S. 64 (1958)

Citing Cases

Seagram Sons v. Hostetter

Hostetter v. Idlewild Liquor Corp., 377 U.S. 324, 330. See State Board of Equalization v. Young's Market Co.,…

Hostetter v. Idlewild Liquor Corp.

This view of the scope of the Twenty-first Amendment with respect to a State's power to restrict, regulate,…