stating that agency rulings on mixed questions are reviewed for a reasonable basis, unless the contested meaning of a statutory term can be isolated as a question of law
Summary of this case from Fulani v. F.C.CNo. 72-1311.
May 21, 1973, OCTOBER TERM, 1972.
C.A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied. MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS would grant certiorari. Reported below: 474 F. 2d 774.
stating that agency rulings on mixed questions are reviewed for a reasonable basis, unless the contested meaning of a statutory term can be isolated as a question of law
Summary of this case from Fulani v. F.C.Crelying on text of Fourth Amendment
Summary of this case from State v. AdkinsFull title:CALIFORNIA v. FRITO-LAY, Inc., et al
Court:U.S.
Date published: May 21, 1973
Maryland-National Capital Park Planning Comm'n v. United States Postal Serv., 159 U.S.App.D.C. 158, 166, 487…
People Against Nuclear Energy v. United States Nuclear Regulatory CommissionThe question whether NEPA requires consideration of psychological health effects is an issue of law. See…