From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

California Brown v. Safeway, Inc.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Feb 11, 2011
633 F.3d 1210 (9th Cir. 2011)

Opinion

Nos. 08-55671, 08-55708.

February 11, 2011.

Jonathan Michael Eisenberg, Deputy Attorney General, California Department of Justice, Patricia Laurie Nagler, Esquire, AGCA-Office of the California Attorney General, Los Angeles, CA, Craig Stewart, Jones Day, San Francisco, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellant.

Daniel Beck, Roll Law Group P.C., Legal Department, Alan Benjamin Clark, Esquire, Latham Watkins, LLP, Jeffrey Alan Levee, Esquire, Kathleen P. Wallace, Jones Day, Linda S. Husar, Esquire, Reed Smith LLP, Jeffrey A. Berman, Sidley Austin LLP, Los Angeles, CA, Peter Huston, Esquire, Latham Watkins, LLP, Robert B. Pringle, Winston Strawn LLP, San Francisco, CA, Jeremy Paul Sherman, Esquire, Seyfarth Shaw, LLP, Chicago, IL, Craig Stewart, Phillip Aaron Proger, Esquire, Jones Day, Jonathan C. Fritts, Morgan Lewis BocMus LLP, Andrew Dean Roth, Esquire, Bredhoff Kaiser, PLLC, Washington, DC, Brady R. Johnson, Senior Counsel, Washington State Attorney General's Office, Seattle, WA, Jennifer L. Pratt, Antitrust Section, Columbus, OH, for Defendants-Appellees.

Prior report: 615 F.3d 1171.


ORDER


Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit.

Judges Bybee and Murguia did not participate in the deliberations or vote in this case.


Summaries of

California Brown v. Safeway, Inc.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Feb 11, 2011
633 F.3d 1210 (9th Cir. 2011)
Case details for

California Brown v. Safeway, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:State of CALIFORNIA, ex rel. Edmund G. BROWN, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant v…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Feb 11, 2011

Citations

633 F.3d 1210 (9th Cir. 2011)

Citing Cases

State v. Safeway, Inc.

A majority of non-recused active judges voted to rehear this case en banc pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3.…