Summary
reinstating petitioner's gain time in accordance with the opinion in Lynce
Summary of this case from Young v. MooreOpinion
Nos. 84088 and 86182
May 22, 1997
Two Consolidated Original Proceedings — Habeas Corpus and Mandamus
Wendy M. Edmonds and R. Mitchell Prugh of Middleton, Prugh Anderson, P.A., Melrose, Florida, on behalf of Russell Calamia.
John C. Schaible, Florida Institutional Legal Services, Inc., Gainesville, Florida, on behalf of Jeffrey Lynn Hock, for Petitioner
Susan A. Maher, Deputy General, Department of Corrections, Tallahassee, Florida, for Respondent
On petition for writ of certiorari, the United States Supreme Court vacated our previous decision in this cause and remanded the case for further consideration in light of its decision in Lynce v. Mathis, 117 S.Ct. 891 (1997). Calamia v. Singletary, 117 S.Ct. 1309 (1997). In view of the holding ofLynce, we grant the petition for writ of habeas corpus of Russell Calamia and the petition for writ of mandamus of Jeffrey Lynn Hock. We direct respondent to reinstate the petitioners' administrative and provisional gain time in accordance with the opinion in Lynce v. Mathis.
Calamia v. Singletary, 686 So.2d 1337 (Fla. 1996).
It is so ordered.
KOGAN, C.J., and OVERTON, SHAW, GRIMES, HARDING, WELLS and ANSTEAD, JJ., concur.