From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cahill v. City of Rochester

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jan 30, 1906
76 N.E. 1110 (N.Y. 1906)

Opinion

Argued January 15, 1906

Decided January 30, 1906

William W. Webb, Corporation Counsel ( John M. Stull of counsel), for appellant.

Henry R. Glynn and Harvey F. Remington for respondent.


Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: CULLEN, Ch. J., O'BRIEN, HAIGHT, VANN, WERNER and WILLARD BARTLETT, JJ. Not sitting: HISCOCK, J.


Summaries of

Cahill v. City of Rochester

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jan 30, 1906
76 N.E. 1110 (N.Y. 1906)
Case details for

Cahill v. City of Rochester

Case Details

Full title:BERNARD CAHILL, Respondent, v . THE CITY OF ROCHESTER, Appellant

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Jan 30, 1906

Citations

76 N.E. 1110 (N.Y. 1906)
76 N.E. 1110