From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cabrera-Vasquez v. Barr

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Dec 17, 2019
No. 15-72890 (9th Cir. Dec. 17, 2019)

Opinion

No. 15-72890

12-17-2019

ALFREDO ERNESTO CABRERA-VASQUEZ, Petitioner, v. WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General, Respondent.


NOT FOR PUBLICATION

Agency No. A205-289-658 MEMORANDUM On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals Before: WALLACE, CANBY, and TASHIMA, Circuit Judges.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

Alfredo Ernesto Cabrera-Vasquez, a native and citizen of Guatemala, petitions pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals' ("BIA") order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge's decision denying his application for asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture ("CAT"). Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review de novo questions of law, Cerezo v. Mukasey, 512 F.3d 1163, 1166 (9th Cir. 2008), except to the extent that deference is owed to the BIA's interpretation of the governing statutes and regulations, Simeonov v. Ashcroft, 371 F.3d 532, 535 (9th Cir. 2004). We review for substantial evidence the agency's factual findings. Zehatye v. Gonzales, 453 F.3d 1182, 1184-85 (9th Cir. 2006). We dismiss in part and deny in part the petition for review.

The BIA did not err in finding that Cabrera-Vasquez did not establish membership in a cognizable social group. See Reyes v. Lynch, 842 F.3d 1125, 1131 (9th Cir. 2016) (in order to demonstrate membership in a particular group, "[t]he applicant must 'establish that the group is (1) composed of members who share a common immutable characteristic, (2) defined with particularity, and (3) socially distinct within the society in question'" (quoting Matter of M-E-V-G-, 26 I. & N. Dec. 227, 237 (BIA 2014))); see also Barrios v. Holder, 581 F.3d 849, 854-55 (9th Cir. 2009) (holding young Guatemalan men who resist gang recruitment is not a particular social group). To the extent Cabrera-Vasquez raises a proposed particular social group based on characteristics that he did not raise before the agency, we lack jurisdiction to consider it. See Barron v. Ashcroft, 358 F.3d 674, 677-78 (9th Cir. 2004) (court lacks jurisdiction to review claims not presented to the agency).

Cabrera-Vasquez does not challenge the BIA's findings that he failed to establish an anti-gang opinion or that he was outspoken against the gangs. See Martinez-Serrano v. INS, 94 F.3d 1256, 1259-60 (9th Cir. 1996) (issues not specifically raised and argued in a party's opening brief are waived). Substantial evidence supports the agency's conclusion that Cabrera-Vasquez otherwise failed to establish he was or would be persecuted on account of a protected ground. See Zetino v. Holder, 622 F.3d 1007, 1016 (9th Cir. 2010) (an applicant's "desire to be free from harassment by criminals motivated by theft or random violence by gang members bears no nexus to a protected ground"). Thus, Cabrera-Vasquez's asylum and withholding of removal claims fail.

Substantial evidence also supports the agency's denial of CAT relief because Cabrera-Vasquez failed to show it is more likely than not he will be tortured by or with the consent or acquiescence of the government if returned to Guatemala. See Aden v. Holder, 589 F.3d 1040, 1047 (9th Cir. 2009); see also Garcia-Milian v. Holder, 755 F.3d 1026, 1033-35 (9th Cir. 2014) (concluding that petitioner did not establish the necessary "state action" for CAT relief).

We lack jurisdiction to consider Cabrera-Vasquez's contentions as to prosecutorial discretion because he failed to raise the issue before the agency. See Barron, 358 F.3d at 677-78.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED in part; DENIED in part.


Summaries of

Cabrera-Vasquez v. Barr

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Dec 17, 2019
No. 15-72890 (9th Cir. Dec. 17, 2019)
Case details for

Cabrera-Vasquez v. Barr

Case Details

Full title:ALFREDO ERNESTO CABRERA-VASQUEZ, Petitioner, v. WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Dec 17, 2019

Citations

No. 15-72890 (9th Cir. Dec. 17, 2019)