From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

C. of N.Y. v. Dry Dock, E. Brdwy

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jul 11, 1929
168 N.E. 436 (N.Y. 1929)

Opinion

Argued June 12, 1929

Decided July 11, 1929

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

Alfred T. Davison and Addison B. Scoville for appellant.

Arthur J.W. Hilly, Corporation Counsel ( Elliot S. Benedict, Charles W. Miller and J. Joseph Lilly of counsel), for respondent.


Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: CARDOZO, Ch. J., POUND, CRANE, LEHMAN, KELLOGG, O'BRIEN and HUBBS, JJ.


Summaries of

C. of N.Y. v. Dry Dock, E. Brdwy

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jul 11, 1929
168 N.E. 436 (N.Y. 1929)
Case details for

C. of N.Y. v. Dry Dock, E. Brdwy

Case Details

Full title:THE CITY OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. DRY DOCK, EAST BROADWAY AND BATTERY…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Jul 11, 1929

Citations

168 N.E. 436 (N.Y. 1929)
168 N.E. 436

Citing Cases

Burke v. City of New York

In other words, we are not now dealing with a breach of contract obligation but, rather, with whether the…

Burgess v. Relkin-Relgreen Realty Co.

The legislative history of an analogous provision, section 295 Lab. of the Labor Law, reveals that the…