From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Byers v. State

Criminal Court of Appeals of Oklahoma
Sep 5, 1911
6 Okla. Crim. 623 (Okla. Crim. App. 1911)

Summary

In Murray the defendant was charged with obtaining money by means of false pretenses, the result of selling cotton on which there existed a landlord's lien and of which he did not advise the purchaser.

Summary of this case from Rogers v. State

Opinion

No. A-680.

Opinion Filed September 5, 1911.

Appeal from Greer County Court; Jarrett Todd, Judge.


On the 27th day of November, 1911, judgment was pronounced against appellant for violating the prohibitory liquor law, and he was sentenced to pay a fine of $50 and to be confined in the county jail for a period of 30 days. At the time of the rendition of the judgment appellant was allowed by the court 60 days time within which to perfect his appeal to this court. The case-made contains a stipulation signed on the 27th day of December, 1909, by the county attorney and counsel for appellant, in which it is stated that it contains a true and correct copy of all the records, judgments and journal entries in said case. The case-made was signed and certified by the county judge on the 3rd day of January, 1910, and his signature is duly attested by the clerk of said court and verified by the seal of said court. Attached to the case-made but below the signature of the county judge is what purports to be an order extending the time within which appellant might perfect his appeal to the 27th day of March, 1910. This constitutes no part of the case-made and cannot be considered by us. See Fortner v. State, 5 Okla. Cr. 609. Appellant did not perfect his appeal until the 26th day of March, 1910. As this was after the time allowed by the trial court within which the appellant should perfect his appeal, we have no jurisdiction of the case and the appeal is therefore dismissed.


Summaries of

Byers v. State

Criminal Court of Appeals of Oklahoma
Sep 5, 1911
6 Okla. Crim. 623 (Okla. Crim. App. 1911)

In Murray the defendant was charged with obtaining money by means of false pretenses, the result of selling cotton on which there existed a landlord's lien and of which he did not advise the purchaser.

Summary of this case from Rogers v. State
Case details for

Byers v. State

Case Details

Full title:MURRAY BYERS v. STATE

Court:Criminal Court of Appeals of Oklahoma

Date published: Sep 5, 1911

Citations

6 Okla. Crim. 623 (Okla. Crim. App. 1911)
117 P. 653

Citing Cases

Wilson v. State

Such purported order is nullity. Fortner v. State, 5 Okla. Cr. 609, 115 P. 378; Byers v. State, 6 Okla. Cr.…

Rogers v. State

Though perhaps necessary to be alleged and proven to establish the ultimate consummation of the crime, they…